Banking the Unbanked

CalAccount Market Study and Feasibility Assessment

Jonathan W. Welburn, Robert Bozick, Maya Buenaventura, David Metz, Vegard M. Nygaard, Patricia K. Tong, Kelsey O'Hollaren, Jessie Coe, Jessie Wang, Lane F. Burgette, et al.

ResearchPublished Jul 1, 2024

Cover: Banking the Unbanked

This report was updated in August 2024 to reflect changes based on public comments.

This report documents an analysis, conducted in response to the California Public Banking Option Act, of the feasibility of the CalAccount Program, which would seek to facilitate basic financial transactions for unbanked and underbanked Californians by providing them with a voluntary, zero-fee, zero-penalty, federally insured transaction account and related payment services.

The authors find that the expected benefits of CalAccount—particularly savings among Californians in marginalized groups gained by avoiding fees associated with banking and the use of alternative financial services—marginally outweigh the expected costs of CalAccount. The authors also find that the CalAccount Program is generally feasible, with two important caveats: Banks may have little incentive to participate in and promote the program, and lack of interest among California's unbanked and underbanked populations may pose a significant challenge to achieving sufficient enrollment in the program. The authors document their findings on program feasibility and the trade-offs between program costs and benefits, and they provide recommendations on implementing the program.

Key Takeaways

The CalAccount Program has two main potential benefits

  • Annual savings for participants in CalAccount—mainly from avoiding fees associated with banking and the use of alternative financial services—could range from $41 to $101 per household for unbanked Californians and from $131 to $185 per household for underbanked Californians. For low-income households, these savings could have meaningful impacts.
  • CalAccount could significantly reduce disparities in access to banking by race and ethnicity.

The CalAccount Program is feasible, with two important caveats

  • There are no prohibitive concerns that would prevent the CalAccount Program's implementation.
  • However, offering no-fee accounts, at scale, may not be profitable and may not, on its own, provide ample incentive to banks to participate in CalAccount.
  • Enrollment may be one of the largest challenges for CalAccount feasibility, and the largest barrier to enrollment is lack of interest among California's unbanked and underbanked populations.

Recommendations

  • Implement CalAccount with instant payments: Mandating faster check-clearing times, which would provide account holders faster access to their funds, may reduce reliance on check-cashing services.
  • Leverage low-cost options for in-person services, including enrollment: Implementing CalAccount as a mobile banking–only program, without the use of physical locations, is unlikely to garner sufficient uptake for benefits to balance costs.
  • To achieve sufficient enrollment in CalAccount, maximize outreach using community partners, including community organizations, faith-based organizations, and stakeholder groups.
  • Consider an implementation study that would explore challenges for CalAccount enrollment, especially lack of trust in banks and the government; consider how to enlist community partners in maximizing CalAccount enrollment; and provide more details about how the CalAccount Program would be structured.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Welburn, Jonathan W., Robert Bozick, Maya Buenaventura, David Metz, Vegard M. Nygaard, Patricia K. Tong, Kelsey O'Hollaren, Jessie Coe, Jessie Wang, Lane F. Burgette, Katherine Obenschain, Jim Mignano, Shannon Prier, Natalie Cox, Chandra Garber, Anujin Nergui, Kami Ehrich, Elizabeth Marsolais, Samuel Absher, George Zuo, Rakesh Pandey, Lily Hoak, Nicolas M. Robles, and James Syme, Banking the Unbanked: CalAccount Market Study and Feasibility Assessment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA3117-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.