Conflict Trends and Conflict Drivers

An Empirical Assessment of Historical Conflict Patterns and Future Conflict Projections

Thomas S. Szayna, Angela O'Mahony, Jennifer Kavanagh, Stephen Watts, Bryan Frederick, Tova C. Norlen, Phoenix Voorhies

ResearchPublished Sep 12, 2017

Cover: Conflict Trends and Conflict Drivers

Armed conflict has declined in both frequency and intensity since the end of the Cold War. The trends are especially clear for interstate conflict, but they also hold true for intrastate conflict. Taking into account historical trends and projections of key conflict drivers, the interstate and intrastate baseline future conflict projections in this report depict a continued decline through 2040, with interstate conflict down to extremely low levels and a much lower incidence of intrastate conflict. Some divergence from these projections is likely. The three factors that most strongly increased interstate conflict expectations were declining U.S. preeminence, declining capabilities of international organizations, and declining prevalence of consolidated democracies. The incidence of intrastate conflict is expected to increase if the capacity of state institutions or the rate of economic growth declines. Although the authors' projections indicate that interstate conflict may be rare in the future, the United States must retain a ready and credible land power deterrent to ensure such a future. Such a deterrent might not be used frequently, but its very existence delays the rise of a challenger and has a dampening effect on the incidence of conflict. The authors' projections also indicate that intrastate conflict (including proxy wars) will continue to be the main form of conflict incidence and, given the U.S. position in the international state system, Army forces are likely to become engaged in such conflicts. The trends toward a decrease in conflict incidence do not necessarily mean fewer U.S. interventions.

Key Takeaways

Trends in Conflict

  • Overall levels of conflict have been declining in the past two decades.
  • Interstate violence has decreased the most, both in the incidence and intensity of armed conflict.
  • Intrastate conflict and low-intensity violence have declined more slowly, but have decreased in incidence and intensity.

Key Factors in Change in Conflict Patterns

  • Capacity of state institutions
  • Degree of ethnic and sectarian polarization
  • Prevalence of consolidated democracies
  • Rate of economic growth
  • Extent of economic interdependence
  • Capabilities of international organizations
  • Degree of U.S. preeminence
  • Strength of international norms
  • Diffusion of lethal technology
  • Extent of resource stress because of population pressures

Future Projections of Conflict

  • Both the interstate and intrastate baseline future conflict projections depict a continued decline through 2040.
  • The three factors that most strongly increased interstate conflict expectations were declining U.S. preeminence, declining capabilities of international organizations, and declining prevalence of consolidated democracies.
  • The two factors that most strongly increased intrastate conflict expectations were declining capacity of state institutions and declining rates of economic growth.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Szayna, Thomas S., Angela O'Mahony, Jennifer Kavanagh, Stephen Watts, Bryan Frederick, Tova C. Norlen, and Phoenix Voorhies, Conflict Trends and Conflict Drivers: An Empirical Assessment of Historical Conflict Patterns and Future Conflict Projections. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1063.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.