Stackable credential programs—that is, programs that facilitate students' ability to earn multiple certificates or degrees—have been a priority for Ohio. In this report, RAND researchers examine students who earned postsecondary certificates in Ohio and went on to earn additional educational credentials. Focusing on three fields, the researchers describe which types of credentials were earned and how students progressed through institutions.

Stacking Educational Credentials in Ohio

Pathways Through Postsecondary Education in Health Care, Manufacturing and Engineering Technology, and Information Technology

Lindsay Daugherty, Jenna W. Kramer, Drew M. Anderson, Robert Bozick

ResearchPublished May 11, 2020

Cover: Stacking Educational Credentials in Ohio
Download PDF
Additional Downloads

Includes Technical Appendix

Stackable credential programs—that is, programs that facilitate students' ability to earn multiple postsecondary certificates or degrees—have been a priority for Ohio, which has a long history of legislation, state and regional initiatives, and institution-led efforts to build more-effective pathways to address the needs of employers and students. To assess progress and inform ongoing efforts to scale stackable credentials, the Ohio Department of Higher Education and the RAND Corporation established a research partnership. In this report, RAND researchers examine students who earned postsecondary certificates in health care, manufacturing and engineering technology (MET), or information technology (IT) fields at Ohio institutions between the 2004–2005 and 2012–2013 academic years and went on to earn (or stack) additional educational credentials. The authors descriptively examine the completion of credentials over time, the types of students who are earning certificates and going on to stack credentials, the subfields and levels of credentials earned, the types of institutions students earned credentials from, and the credit accumulation and terms of enrollment for students earning different types of credentials.

Key Findings

  • Between the 2004–2005 and 2012–2013 academic years, the number of certificate-earners doubled in health care and MET fields, but the researchers did not observe similar increases in certificates earned in IT.
  • Rates of stacking were highest among students who first earned an IT certificate in the 2012–2013 academic year (59 percent), followed by MET (43 percent) and health care (33 percent). Rates of stacking in health care increased substantially over time, but the researchers did not see increases in MET or IT rates.
  • Despite being represented at higher percentages among certificate-earners relative to degree-earners, black students and adult learners (aged 25 or older) were less likely to stack additional credentials relative to white students and younger students.
  • Among students who stacked one or more additional credentials within four years of completing a certificate, 71 percent had stacked to the associate's degree level and 9 percent had stacked to the bachelor's degree level.
  • More than one in four certificate-earners went on to stack credentials outside of the field in which they earned their initial certificates, and rates of cross-field stacking were particularly high for IT certificate-earners.
  • Students who earned an initial certificate at a community college or university were more likely to earn additional credentials than were students who earned their first certificate at an Ohio Technical Center.
  • Students who stacked both a certificate and an associate's degree had accumulated an average of 17 additional credit hours and had enrolled for a little more than one additional term, on average, than students who earned an associate's degree only.

Recommendations

  • Further investigate what is driving differences in rates of stacking for certain groups (e.g., black students, students who earn a certificate at an Ohio Technical Center), and consider ways to address possible disparities in access and support for these students.
  • Examine labor market data to determine which types of programs and combinations of credentials are providing value to employers and individuals.
  • Conduct analysis with more-recent data to examine patterns in cross-institution stacking after the rollout of statewide articulation agreements, and continue to identify ways to encourage cross-institution stacking of credentials.
  • Determine what is driving the accumulation of additional credit hours and terms of enrollment for students who stack credentials relative to students who earn an associate's degree without stacking, and identify ways to support the efficient movement of students through multiple credentials.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Daugherty, Lindsay, Jenna W. Kramer, Drew M. Anderson, and Robert Bozick, Stacking Educational Credentials in Ohio: Pathways Through Postsecondary Education in Health Care, Manufacturing and Engineering Technology, and Information Technology, RAND Corporation, RR-A136-1, 2020. As of October 13, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA136-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Daugherty, Lindsay, Jenna W. Kramer, Drew M. Anderson, and Robert Bozick, Stacking Educational Credentials in Ohio: Pathways Through Postsecondary Education in Health Care, Manufacturing and Engineering Technology, and Information Technology. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2020. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA136-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This research was sponsored by the ECMC Foundation and the U.S. Department of Education and conducted by RAND Education and Labor.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.